Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts

Thursday, August 20, 2020

RBI ALLOWS ONE TIME RESTRUCTURING OF LOANS - Resolution Framework for COVID-19-related Stress

RBI has in its Monetary Policy and Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies focused on the Measures Aimed at Mitigating the Economic Fallout of COVID-19.

In order to help out borrowers dealing with liquidity issues, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently proposed restructuring of personal loans for those struggling with repayments in its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies.

In the review on monetary and credit policies RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said a window under the June 7,2019 “Prudential Framework on Resolution of Stressed Assets” dated June 7, 2019 be provided which will enable lenders to implement a resolution plan, without a change in ownership. Any resolution plan implemented under the Prudential Framework, which involves granting of any concessions on account of financial difficulty of the borrower, entails an asset classification downgrade except when accompanied by a change in ownership, subject to prescribed conditions.

“...it has been decided to provide a window under the June 7th Prudential Framework to enable lenders to implement a resolution plan in respect of eligible corporate exposures - without change in ownership - as well as personal loans, while classifying such exposures as standard assets, subject to specified conditions,” RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das said in his statement on Thursday the 6th August 2020. The regulatory approach has to be “dynamic, proactive and balanced”, Das said. The RBI will ensure that necessary safeguards are in place to maintain financial stability, he added.

A restructuring framework for MSMEs that were in default but ‘standard’ as on January 1, 2020 is already in place. The scheme has provided relief to a large number of MSMEs. With COVID-19 continuing to disrupt normal functioning and cash flows, the stress in the MSME sector has got accentuated, warranting further support. Accordingly, it has been decided that stressed MSME borrowers will be made eligible for restructuring their debt under the existing framework, provided their accounts with the concerned lender were classified as standard as on March 1, 2020. This restructuring will have to be implemented by March 31, 2021.

What is Restructuring Plan  

New loan that replaces the outstanding balance on an older loan, and is paid over a longer period, usually with a lower installment amount. Loans are commonly rescheduled to accommodate a borrower in financial difficulty and, thus, to avoid a default. Also called rescheduled loan.

Under the restructuring plan, banks can now choose to reschedule loan repayments, convert any interest accrued or to be accrued into another credit facility, extend the loan tenor, or even extend moratorium up to two years for the existing loans, depending on the current repayment ability of the eligible borrower.

According to the RBI, lenders must ensure that this New restructuring scheme is only available to borrowers which are facing stress on account of Covid-19. The framework shall not be available for exposures to financial sector entities as well as central and state governments, local government bodies and any body corporate established by an act of parliament or state legislature.

RBI said that borrowers who had been repaying regularly till March 2020 can now have a restructuring of their loan through a framework which will be decided by the bank. As per RBI, the framework for this is required to be fixed by December 31 and implemented within 90 days from then. Loans in default for more than 30 days as on March 1, 2020, will not qualify for this plan.

Eligibility Criteria

·         Accounts which were in default for not more than 30 days as of March 1 will be eligible for such restructuring. All other stressed accounts will have to follow June 2019 framework for resolution.

·         A committee headed by KV Kamath will be set up to make recommendations to the RBI on the required financial parameters, along with the sector specific benchmarks to be factored into each resolution plans.

·         This committee will also validate the resolution plans for accounts with cumulative debt of Rs 1,500 crore and above.

·         The committee shall check and verify that all the processes have been followed by the parties concerned as desired without interfering with the commercial judgments exercised by the lenders.·         

For cases where the aggregate debt is over Rs 100 crore, the lending institutions will have to obtain an independent credit evaluation for the resolution plan from a recognised credit rating agency.

 

Timeline & Process For Restructuring

·         One-time restructuring plan may be invoked any time before December 31, 2020 and must be implemented within 180 days of invocation.

·         Lending institutions are required to sign an inter-creditor agreement ahead of the restructuring. Lenders who do not sign inter-creditor agreements within 30 days of invocation of resolution plan shall attract 20% provisions.

·         In a multiple banking or consortium lending arrangement, if 60% of the lenders by number and 75% by value do not sign the ICA, then the invocation would be considered as lapsed. The one time restructuring scheme can then not be invoked for such cases again.

·         Lending institutions may allow for extension of the residual tenor of the loan, with or without payment moratorium, by a period not more than two years.

·         In cases where a loan is converted into other instruments, such debt instruments with terms similar to the loan, shall be counted as part of the post-resolution debt.

·         Conversion to any other non-equity instrument will lead to the value of that portion of debt being written down to Re 1.

·         In cases where there are multiple banking or consortium banking arrangement, all disbursements made to the borrowers by the banks and payments made by the borrowers to banks shall be routed through an escrow account maintained with one of the lending institutions.

Asset Classification & Provisions

·         The account will continue to retain standard asset classification after implementation of the plan.

·         Lenders shall have to keep additional 10% provisions against post resolution debt.

Monitoring

The RBI has prescribed a clear monitoring period for accounts which are restructured under this scheme. This period begins from the date of implementation till the point in time when the borrower pays back at least 10% of the residual debt.

·         In case a borrower is in default with any of the lending institutions during the monitoring period, a review period of 30 days gets triggered. If the default is not resolved within this review period, the account is classified as NPA by all lenders involved.

·         Lenders can write back half of the provisions held against restructured accounts after the borrower pays back at least 20% of the residual debt. The remainder of the provisions can be written back after another 10% of the residual debt is repaid, without the account slipping into NPA.

Disclosures

·         Banks will be required to publish disclosures with respect to the number of accounts where a one time-restructuring plan is implemented and the outstanding loans to such accounts, on a quarterly basis starting March 31, 2021.

·         They will also be required to disclose the quantum of loans which were classified as standard after the restructuring plan, but later slipped to NPA during the monitoring period, on a half yearly basis starting September 30, 2021.

·         A disclosure format has been prescribed by the RBI as under: 

Format – A

Format for disclosures to be made in the quarters ending March 31, 2021, June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021

Type of borrower

(A)
Number of accounts where resolution plan has been implemented under this window

(B)
exposure to accounts mentioned at (A) before implementation of the plan

(C)
Of (B), aggregate amount of debt that was converted into other securities

(D)
Additional funding sanctioned, if any, including between invocation of the plan and implementation

(E)
Increase in provisions on account of the implementation of the resolution plan

Personal Loans

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate persons*

 

 

 

 

 

Of which, MSMEs

 

 

 

 

 

Others

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

*As defined in Section 3(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Format-B

Format for disclosures to be made half yearly starting September 30, 2021

Type of borrower

Exposure to accounts classified as Standard consequent to implementation of resolution plan – Position as at the end of the previous half-year (A)

Of (A), aggregate debt that slipped into NPA during the half-year

Of (A) amount written off during the half-year

Of (A) amount paid by the borrowers during the half-year

Exposure to accounts classified as Standard consequent to implementation of resolution plan – Position as at the end of this half-year

Personal Loans

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate persons*

 

 

 

 

 

Of which MSMEs

 

 

 

 

 

Others

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

* As defined in Section 3(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

 

Conditions for the Resolution Framework for COVID-19-related Stress are spelt out in details by RBI. Readers may click on the following link for full details of the said circular no. RBI/2020-21/16 - DOR.No.BP.BC/3/21.04.048/2020-21 dt. 6th August 2020

 

How the One time Restructuring will impact the individual Borrowers:

This scheme covers the bulk of the existing loans sanctioned to individual borrowers and will help them in repaying their loans according to their current repayment capacity as opposed to their repayment ability when they borrowed the loan. This will mainly help those people whose salaries have been cut amid the pandemic or those who have lost their jobs and are not earning at the moment

This decision has come at a time when six-month moratorium announced on Equated Monthly Installment (EMI) is about to end on August 31, which means loan payments will start from September 1. Borrowers who must have opted for the 6-month moratorium can either repay it in one shot or ask lenders to add these to their existing EMIs. Now, borrowers also have the option of converting interest accrued during the moratorium period into a separate loan.

Additionally, borrowers can keep their EMI unchanged but the loan tenure can be extended as well. However, as per experts, if possible, borrowers should aim to pre-pay the EMIs within the next 12 months in order to get rid of the additional debt incurred. Pre-paying 120 per cent of the EMIs that borrowers had to defer is ideal, meaning if a person deferred five EMIs, they are advised to pre-pay six additional EMIs over the next 12 months as it will help them bounce back in repayment plan and get out of debt quicker.

Source: rbi.org.in, Bloomberg Quint & Times Now

Friday, April 19, 2019

The Regulatory Sandbox: Principles and Objectives

An Ideal FinTech Sandbox

What is Regulatory Sandbox?
• A regulatory sandbox is a regulatory approach,  typically summarized in writing and published, that allows live, time-bound testing of innovations under a regulator’s oversight. Novel financial products,technologies, and business models can be tested under a set of rules, supervision requirements, and appropriate safeguards.
• A sandbox creates a conducive and contained space where incumbents and challengers experiment with innovations at the edge or even outside of the existing innovations at the edge or even outside of the existing regulatory framework. 
• A regulatory sandbox brings the cost of innovation down, reduces barriers to entry, and allows regulators to collect important insights before deciding if further regulatory action is necessary. 
• A successful test may result in several outcomes, including full-fledged or tailored authorization of the innovation, changes in regulation, or a cease-and desist order.
• The first regulatory sandbox was launched in 2015 in the U.K. and generated great interest from regulators and innovators around the world. At the beginning of 2018, there were more than 20 jurisdictions actively implementing or exploring the concept. 
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) set up an inter-regulatory Working Group (WG) in July 2016 to look into and report on the granular aspects of FinTech and its implications so as to review the regulatory framework and respond to the dynamics of the rapidly evolving FinTech scenario. FinTech stands for financial technology and describes technologically enabled financial innovations. 
The WG included representatives from RBI, SEBI, IRDA, PFRDA, NPCI, IDRBT, select banks and rating agencies.The report of the WG was released on February 08, 2018 for public comments. 

One of the key recommendations of the WG was to introduce an appropriate framework for a regulatory sandbox (RS) within a well-defined space and duration where the financial sector regulator will provide the requisite regulatory guidance, so as to increase efficiency, manage risks and create new opportunities for consumers.
The Reserve Bank of India released on 18th April 2019, the draft ‘Enabling Framework for Regulatory Sandbox’. Comments on the draft guidelines are invited from stakeholders by May 08, 2019. 
The Regulatory Sandbox: Principles and Objectives
The Regulatory Sandbox
A regulatory sandbox (RS) usually refers to live testing of new products or services in a controlled/test regulatory environment for which regulators may (or may not) permit certain regulatory relaxations for the limited purpose of the testing. The RS allows the regulator, the innovators, the financial service providers (as potential deployers of the technology) and the customers (as final users) to conduct field tests to collect evidence on the benefits and risks of new financial innovations, while carefully monitoring and containing their risks. It can provide a structured avenue for the regulator to engage with the ecosystem and to develop innovation-enabling or innovation-responsive regulations that facilitate delivery of relevant, low-cost financial products. The RS is potentially an important tool which enables more dynamic, evidence-based regulatory environments which learn from, and evolve with, emerging technologies.
Objectives
The RS provides an environment to innovative technology-led entities for limited-scale testing of a new product or service that may or may not involve some relaxation in a regulatory requirement before a wider-scale launch.
The RS is, at its core, a formal regulatory programme for market participants to test new products, services or business models with customers in a live environment, subject to certain safeguards and oversight.
The proposed financial service to be launched under the RS should include new or emerging technology, or use of existing technology in an innovative way and should address a problem, or bring benefits to consumers.
Regulatory Sandbox: Benefits
The setting up of an RS can bring several benefits, some of which are significant and are delineated below:
  1. The RS fosters ‘learning by doing’ on all sides. Regulators obtain first-hand empirical evidence on the benefits and risks of emerging technologies and their implications, enabling them to take a considered view on the regulatory changes or new regulations that may be needed to support useful innovation, while containing the attendant risks. Incumbent financial service providers, including banks, also improve their understanding of how new financial technologies might work, which helps them to appropriately integrate such new technologies with their business plans. Innovators and FinTech companies can improve their understanding of regulations that govern their offerings and shape their products accordingly. Finally, feedback from customers, as end users, educates both the regulator and the innovator as to what costs and benefits might accrue to customers from these innovations.
  2. Users of an RS can test the product’s viability without the need for a larger and more expensive roll-out. If the product appears to have the potential to be successful, the product might then be authorized and brought to the broader market more quickly. If any concerns arise, during the sandbox period, appropriate modifications can be made before the product is launched in the broader market.
  3. FinTechs provide solutions that can further financial inclusion in a significant way. The RS can go a long way in not only improving the pace of innovation and technology absorption but also in financial inclusion and in improving financial reach. Areas that can potentially get a thrust from the RS include microfinance, innovative small savings and micro-insurance products, remittances, mobile banking and other digital payments.
  4. By providing a structured and institutionalized environment for evidence-based regulatory decision-making, the dependence of the regulator on industry/stakeholder consultations only is correspondingly reduced.
  5. The RS could lead to better outcomes for consumers through an increased range of products and services, reduced costs and improved access to financial services.
Regulatory Sandbox: Risks and Limitations
1 Innovators may lose some flexibility and time in going through the RS process (but running the sandbox program in a time-bound manner at each of its stages can mitigate this risk).
2 Case-by-case bespoke authorizations and regulatory relaxations can involve time and discretional judgements (this risk may be addressed by handling applications in a transparent manner and following well-defined principles in decision-making).
3 The RBI or its RS cannot provide any legal waivers.
4 Post-sandbox testing, a successful experimenter may still require regulatory approvals before the product/services/technology can be permitted for wider application.
5 Regulators can potentially face some legal issues, such as those relating to consumer losses in case of failed experimentation or from competitors who are outside the RS, especially those whose applications have been/may be rejected. These, however, may not have much legal ground if the RS framework and processes are transparent and have clear entry and exit criteria. Upfront clarity that liability for customer or business risks shall devolve on the entity entering the RS will be important in this context.
Regulatory Sandbox: Eligibility Criteria for Participating in the Sandbox
The target applicants for entry to the RS are FinTech firms which meet the eligibility conditions prescribed for start-ups by the government.
The focus of the RS will be to encourage innovations where
  1. there is absence of governing regulations;
  2. there is a need to temporarily ease regulations for enabling the proposed innovation;
  3. the proposed innovation shows promise of easing/effecting delivery of financial services in a significant way.
Design Aspects of the Regulatory Sandbox
The RBI shall consider the following key design features for the RS:
Sandbox Cohorts and Product/Services/Technology
The RS may run a few cohorts (end-to-end sandbox process), with a limited number of entities in each cohort testing their products during a stipulated period. The RS shall be based on thematic cohorts focussing on financial inclusion, payments and lending, digital KYC, etc. The cohorts may run for varying time periods but should ordinarily be completed within six months.
An indicative list of innovative products/services/technology which could be considered for testing under RS are as follows.
1 Innovative Products/Services
  • Retail payments
  • Money transfer services
  • Marketplace lending
  • Digital KYC
  • Financial advisory services
  • Wealth management services
  • Digital identification services
  • Smart contracts
  • Financial inclusion products
  • Cyber security products
2 Innovative Technology
  • Mobile technology applications (payments, digital identity, etc.)
  • Data Analytics
  • Application Program Interface (APIs) services
  • Applications under block chain technologies
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning applications
2 Regulatory Requirements/Relaxations for Sandbox Applicant
The RBI may consider relaxing, if warranted, some of the regulatory requirements for sandbox applicants for the duration of the RS on a case-to-case basis. However, regulatory requirements that shall mandatorily have to be maintained by the applicants are as follows:
  • Customer privacy and data protection
  • Secure storage of and access to payment data of stakeholders
  • Security of transactions
  • KYC/AML/CFT requirements
  • Statutory restrictions
3 Exclusion from Sandbox Testing
The entities may not be suitable for RS if the proposed financial service is similar to those that are already being offered in India unless the applicants can show that either a different technology is being gainfully applied or the same technology is being applied in a more efficient and effective manner.
An indicative negative list of products/services/technology which may not be accepted for testing is as follows:
  • Credit registry
  • Credit information
  • Crypto currency/Crypto assets services
  • Trading/investing/settling in crypto assets
  • Initial Coin Offerings, etc.
  • Chain marketing services
  • Any product/services which have been banned by the regulators/Government of India

Number of FinTech Entities to be Part of a Cohort
The focus of the RS should be narrow in terms of areas of innovation, and limited in terms of intake. The RS shall begin the testing process with 10-12 selected entities through a comprehensive selection process as detailed in the framework under ‘Fit and Proper criteria for selection of participants in RS’.
Fit and Proper Criteria for Selection of Participants in RS
1 The entities should satisfy the following conditions:
  1. The entity should be a company incorporated and registered in India and shall meet the criteria of a start-up as per Govt. of India, DIPP Notification No. G.S.R. 364(E) dated April 11, 20181.
  2. The entity shall have a minimum net worth of Rs.50 lakh as per its latest audited balance sheet.
  3. The promoter(s)/director(s) of the entity are fit and proper as per the criteria enumerated in Annex I. A declaration and undertaking shall be obtained to this effect as per Annex II.
  4. The conduct of the bank accounts of the entity as well its promoters/directors should be satisfactory.
  5. A satisfactory CIBIL or equivalent credit score of the promoter(s)/director(s)/ entity is required.
  6. Applicants should demonstrate that their products/services are technologically ready for deployment in the broader market.
  7. The entity must demonstrate arrangements to ensure compliance with the existing regulations/laws on consumer data protection and privacy.
  8. There should be adequate safeguards built in its IT systems to ensure that it is protected against unauthorized access, alteration, destruction, disclosure or dissemination of records and data.
  9. The entity should have robust IT infrastructure and managerial resources. The IT systems used for end-to-end sandbox processing will be checked by the RBI to ensure end-to-end integrity of information processing by the entities concerned.
2 The proposed FinTech solution should highlight an existing gap in the financial ecosystem and the proposal should demonstrate how it would address the problem, or bring benefits to consumers or the industry or perform the same work more efficiently.
3 The applicants should demonstrate that there is a relevant regulatory barrier that prevents deployment of the product/service at scale, or a genuinely innovative and significantly important product/service/solution is proposed for which relevant regulation is necessary but absent.
4 The test scenarios and expected outcomes of the sandbox experimentation should be clearly defined, and the sandbox entity should report to the RBI on the test progress, based on an agreed schedule.
5 The appropriate boundary conditions (refer to section 6.7) should be clearly defined for the RS to be meaningfully executed while sufficiently protecting consumers’ privacy.
6 An acceptable exit and transition strategy should be clearly defined in the event that the proposed FinTech-driven financial service has to be discontinued, or can proceed to be deployed on a broader scale after exiting the RS.
7 The applicants shall be required to share the results of Proof of Concept (PoC)/testing of use cases including any relevant prior experiences before getting admission into RS for testing, wherever applicable.
8 Significant risks arising from the proposed FinTech solution or financial service should be assessed and mitigated.
Extending or Exiting the Sandbox
At the end of the sandbox period, the regulatory relaxations provided to the entities will expire and the sandbox entity must exit the RS. In the event that the sandbox entity requires an extension of the sandbox period, it should apply to the RBI at least one month before the expiration of the sandbox period and with valid reasons to support the application for extension. The decision of the RBI on the application will be final.
The sandbox testing will be discontinued any time at the discretion of the RBI if the entity does not achieve its intended purpose, based on the latest test scenarios, expected outcomes and schedule mutually agreed by the sandbox entity with the RBI. Further, the RS may also be discontinued if the entity is unable to fully comply with the relevant regulatory requirements and other conditions specified at any stage during the sandbox process. The sandbox entity may also exit from the RS at its own discretion by informing the RBI one week in advance. The sandbox entity should ensure that any existing obligation to its customers of the financial service under experimentation is fully addressed before exiting the RS or discontinuing the RS.
Boundary Conditions
When a sandbox operates in the production environment, it must have a well-defined space and duration for the proposed financial service to be launched, within which the consequences of failure can be contained. The appropriate boundary conditions should be clearly defined for the RS to be meaningfully executed while sufficiently protecting the interests of consumers. The boundary conditions for the RS may include the following:
  • Start and end date of the RS
  • Target customer type
  • Limit on the number of customers involved
  • Transaction ceilings or cash holding limits
  • Cap on customer losses
Ensure Transparency
Outreach with stakeholders and clear and adequate information to the participants in the RS is important. The RBI will communicate the entire RS process including its launch, theme of the cohort, and entry and exit criteria through its official website.
Consumer Protection
The sandbox participant will be required to ensure that any existing obligations to the customers of the financial service under experimentation is fulfilled or addressed before exiting or discontinuing the RS. It may be noted that entering the RS does not limit the entity’s liability towards its customers. The entities entering the RS must be upfront and, in a transparent way, notify test customers of potential risks and the available compensation and obtain their explicit consent in this regard.
The Sandbox Process and its Stages in a Regulatory Sandbox
End-to-End Sandbox Process
A detailed end-to-end sandbox process, including the testing of the products/innovations by FinTech entities, shall be overseen by the FinTech Unit (FTU) at the RBI.
The Sandbox Process: Stages and Timelines
Each cohort of the RS shall have the following five stages and timeline:
1 Preliminary Screening (4 weeks)
The FTU shall ensure that the applicant clearly understands the objective and principles of the sandbox and conforms to it. This phase shall last for 4 weeks from the launch of the sandbox, where the applications shall be received by the FTU and evaluated to shortlist applicants meeting the eligibility criteria.
2 Test Design (3 weeks)
This phase may last for 3 weeks. The FTU shall finalize the test design through an iterative engagement with the applicants and identify outcome metrics for evaluating evidence of benefits and risks.
3 Application Assessment (3 weeks)
This phase may last for 3 weeks. The FTU shall vet the test design and propose regulatory modifications, if any.
4 Testing (12 weeks)
This phase may last for a maximum of 12 weeks. The FTU shall generate empirical evidence to assess the tests by close monitoring.
5 Evaluation (4 weeks)
This phase may last for 4 weeks. The final outcome of the testing of products/services/technology as per the expected parameters including viability/acceptability under the RS shall be confirmed by the RBI. The FTU shall assess the outcome reports on the test and decide on whether the product/service is viable and acceptable under the RS.
Statutory and Legal Issues
  • Upon approval, the applicant becomes the entity responsible for operating in the RS. The RBI will provide the appropriate regulatory support by relaxing specific regulatory requirements (which the sandbox entity will otherwise be subject to), where necessary, for the duration of the RS. The RBI shall bear no liability arising from RS process and any liability arising from the experiment will be borne by the applicant as a sandbox entity.
  • Upon successful experimentation and on exiting the RS, the sandbox entity must fully comply with the relevant regulatory requirements. The applicant should clearly understand the objective and principles of the RS. It must be emphasized that the RS is not intended and cannot be used as a means to circumvent legal and regulatory requirements.
  • At the end of the sandbox period, the entity must exit the RS.


Disclosure
The RBI shall reserve the right to publish any relevant information about the RS applicants on its website, including for the purpose of knowledge transfer and collaboration with other international regulatory agencies.

RBI said that innovation and technologies around credit registry and information, cryptocurrency and assets, trading, ICO and chain marketing services may not be accepted as a part of the sandbox.

The RBI further added that the focus of the sandbox will be at innovations, which have an absence of governing regulations; a need to temporarily ease regulations for enabling the proposed innovation; or is expected to effect the delivery of financial services in a significant way.



Source: rbi.org.in, https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_SpeechesView.aspx?Id=1071United Nations Secretary-General’sSpecial Advocate for Inclusive Finance for Development(UNSGSA), yourstory.com, &
https://www.pwc.in/consulting/financial-services/fintech/fintech-insights/the-sandbox-approach.html